School Hierarchy Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

School Hierarchy - Coursework ExampleThe ability to ethically implement decisions in inculcates is a function of the rail management. Different characteristics school hierarchies exist and have their direct effects on the effectuation of decisions. This paper will look into the characteristics that be detrimental to the ethical implementation of decisionsThis is the characteristic of school hierarchies that recognizes just a single channel of information flow. In much(prenominal) hierarchies, the top management atomic number 18 the restore source of information. The decisions made at the top flow downwards and access to feedback is limited. When this happens, the ethical requirements of the community such as inclusion of students with special needs do not obtain feedback from the community (National Research Council, 2012). The overlook of feedback deters application of evaluation measures and is thus detrimental to the implementation of ethical decisions.Decision making is an activity that should be done with precautions. The precautions ensure that there is ethicality in the decisions and that the implementation of the decision will have the intended effects on the involved parties. When this is done, positive outcomes are anticipated and achieved (National Research Council, 2012). To achieve such a situation, the school should involve all the relevant stakeholders to ensure that all the affected people are consulted before decisions are made. This ensures that there are no complaints regarding the decisions and their ethicality. When the stakeholders are not involved in the school hierarchy, the decisions made are hard to implement.Any organizations should have all their activities directed towards the achievement of set objectives. This is also true for school hierarchies. When the hierarchies are based on objectives that are ethical, the activities and decisions made are directed towards the achievement of the objectives (Brazer et al., 2010). Wh en however, the